Skip to main content

Week 3: Robotics+Art

Gutenberg's Printing Press
In week 3’s lecture, Vesna discussed how the industrial revolution changed the process of production and the types of innovations created. Mass production became the main mode of production, shifting from hand crafted artwork that required much skill to an assembly line of simplified jobs that made a day’s work much more efficient. It seems as if the industrial revolution altered metal work and inventions from intricate works of art to mass productions of technology. I initially never considered the printing press as a work of art, but after this lesson, I now understand more clearly that technology and robotics is just a form of mechanical art.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3mLmHUbC240
What really surprised me was that the invention of what we know in the modern culture as robots was actually created for theater. Just as Benjamin and Douglass considered that every type of art can be reproduced mechanically, robots are just that. They have been replicated in digital forms, such as in the movie Robocop, and have changed the meaning of art and its connotations of how we perceive robotics in our modern society. Technology has had to adapt to the ever-changing strides we make in science, and with that, so has the way inventors create their new concepts and complex, mechanical forms of art.

Now, with technology becoming more sophisticated, robots are becoming more and more human-like. Just as Descartes and other philosophers discussed, the distinction between human and robot will become blurred and it will be hard to differentiate between the two. Although no robot has yet to crack the Turing Test, a test of an artificial intelligent being to think and behave as a human, everyday robots are getting closer to being able to think like humans.





Sources:

Vesna, Victoria. “Robotics + Art.” Lecture 3.

Quiah, Priscilla. “Disruptive Innovation.” N.p., n.d. Web. 2015.
<http://cronkitehhh.jmc.asu.edu/blog/2015/04/disruptive-innovation/>

Benjamin, Walter. "The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction" from Illuminations. New York, Schocken Books, 1968, Pgs. 217-251

Davis, Douglas. “The Work of Art in the Age of Digital Reproduction (An Evolving Thesis: 1991-1995).” Leonardo, vol. 28, no. 5, 1995, pp. 381–386. JSTOR, JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/1576221.

Reingold, Eyal. "The Turing Test." N.p., n.d. Web. 1999.
<http://www.psych.utoronto.ca/users/reingold/courses/ai/ai.html>





Comments

  1. brontehalliganApril 23, 2018 at 7:05 PM

    Lia, I really liked your discussion of robotics and theatre. The digital forms of technology has adapted to the world today, and like you said I do believe we are taking strides within science and the technological world, to try and keep up with our consumer identities that we have today. Great post! I enjoyed it

    ReplyDelete
  2. UnknownApril 23, 2018 at 10:36 PM

    I found your post really interesting, I think it is really crazy to think that robots are getting closer to thinking like humans in the near future. However, it is somewhat scary to me, I am scared of robots.

    ReplyDelete
  3. UnknownApril 24, 2018 at 7:48 PM

    I loved how you brought up the overlap between human and robots. I think the idea of creating some artificial being that can simulate the human behavior and emotion is an intrinsically artistic approach toward the nuts and bolts of the modern technology.

    ReplyDelete
  4. UnknownApril 25, 2018 at 5:46 PM

    It's interesting how you talk about machines being artistic in their own way. I feel like there are a lot of machines that have had to not only operate well be aesthetically appealing. Prime examples would be cars and phones which we buy just as much for performance as appearance.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Week 7: Neuroscience + Art

This week’s topic was by far the most interesting topic so far because the brain is a field of science that is very unexplored even though our brains and our consciousness makes up who we are. One idea I thought was interesting was the art project FMRI by Suzanne Anker and Giovanni. They superimposed butterfly wings onto 15 different MRI brain scans, and even though the butterfly wings were identical on all scans, the differences in the brain images made each picture look different. I thought this was interesting because just like how no two people are alike, every brain is completely different too even when the same thing is done to each one of them. Another thing I found to be interesting was the discussion between Freud and Young about dreams and discussion of how the conscious and unconscious function. Although Freud argues that the unconscious is simply “a reservoir of repressed thoughts and motivations,” I agree with Young’s idea that the unconscious is actually
Post a Comment
Read more

WEEK 6: Biotech + Art

The Glowing Effect This week’s lecture on the integration of biotechnology and art was the most interesting topic we have discussed so far. Before this lecture I was never aware of this field of science. I have heard of stem cell research and GMOs but seeing the reaction of combining science and art by making E.Coli listen to jazz or making essentially a lava lamp bunny is both kind of ridiculous but very cool in the sense that these unconventional experiments could change modern day science. To me, the weirdest but coolest topic was Eduardo Kac’s fluorescent bunny, Alba. This bunny is the culmination of artistic and scientific collaboration. By injecting jellyfish proteins into bunny eggs, a glow-in-the-dark bunny was made. At first, I was unsure of why such a thing would be created, but with further research I learned that this type of technology and research was for tagging embryos or furthering the fight towards finding a cure for cancer. Protein Structure I also think
1 comment
Read more

Extra Credit Post 1: Conversations with Andrew Stanton (5/14/18)

Last night I went to an event put on by the Institute of Environmental Systems & Sustainability called “Conversations with Andrew Stanton”. Andrew is the VP of Pixar and has helped to write, direct, create, and even voice movies such as Wall-E, Finding Nemo, and Finding Dory. These three movies have a common trend: subtle environmental conservation stories, but told in different forms. When Andrew Stanton was asked how does he use this medium of animation to tell the story of the environment. Andrew Stanton I thought he was going to go into how sustainability and issues like trash and pollution seen in these movies was always a part of the creation of the movie but he didn’t. He said he never focused on the message of take down consumerism or clean up our oceans, he said he always just tried to find the story, and it just so happened that the story he wanted to tell about love needed certain environmental factors in order to be told. He needed Wall-E to be the las
Post a Comment
Read more