Skip to main content

Week 2: Math+(=)Art

Compare golden ratio (above) to
Selikoff's artwork (below)
Both of my parents are graphic designers and growing up I was often told how inadequate they were in the fields science and mathematics, which I believed until this week’s lecture. After reading Abbott’s novel, Flatland: A Romance of Many Dimensions, I see that my parents are secret mathematicians. As graphic designers, my parents job is to take a concept and make it visual. Often minds my mom zones into a specific part of a company’s identity, say a neuron for a neuroscientist organization, and looks at it from all different perspectives. While she does this, she uses math to interpret an item from different dimensions and perspectives.


I also learned that different looks surprisingly use different mathematical concepts, which I thought was really interesting and something I have never thought about before.
In Vesna’s lecture, Math+Art, she talks about seemingly very mathematical concepts such as geometry, the golden ratio, optics, and symmetry, that are the building blocks to making art such as patterns. When my parents design merchandise for their clients, they have to use these mathematical concepts to create pleasing patterns or identities if their client want a more realistic logo. If the client wants more abstract and conceptual design, as discussed my Henderson, my parents use inspiration from abstracts works of art which were influenced by mathematical theories such as Einstein’s theory of relativity.
My parent's logos for neuroscience client
https://www.chingfoster.com/

After this week’s lesson, I not only learned that art is basically math, I also learned that my parents are part time mathematicians. I asked my mom if she thinks her job involved a lot of math and she said, “yes of course because we have to blow logos up and figure out size and scale if we want to print larger items.” What she doesn’t know is that math used for reproduction purposes is just merely scratching the surface of the amount of math used in art, and I bet she’ll be excited when I tell her she actually is good at math.

Sources:
Henderson, Linda. “The Fourth Dimension and Non-Euclidean Geometry in Modern Art: Conclusion.” MIT Press. 17.3 (1984): 205-10. Print.
Abbott, Edwin. “Flatland: A Romance of Many Dimensions.” N.p., n.d. Web. 12 Oct. 2012. <https://cole.uconline.edu/content>.
Vesna, Victoria. “Math + Art.” Lecture 2.

Selikoff, Nathan. “Suspension 6 & 7” N.p., n.d. Web. 2014. <https://nathanselikoff.com/works/suspensions-6-7>

Mize, Diane. “A Guide to the Golden Ratio (AKA Golden Section or Golden Mean) for Artists.” A Guide to the Golden Ratio (AKA Golden Section or Golden Mean) for Artists. N.p., n.d. Web. 11 Oct. 2012. <http://emptyeasel.com/2009/01/20/a-guide-to-the-golden-ratio-aka-golden-section-or-golden-mean-for-artists/>.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Week 7: Neuroscience + Art

This week’s topic was by far the most interesting topic so far because the brain is a field of science that is very unexplored even though our brains and our consciousness makes up who we are. One idea I thought was interesting was the art project FMRI by Suzanne Anker and Giovanni. They superimposed butterfly wings onto 15 different MRI brain scans, and even though the butterfly wings were identical on all scans, the differences in the brain images made each picture look different. I thought this was interesting because just like how no two people are alike, every brain is completely different too even when the same thing is done to each one of them. Another thing I found to be interesting was the discussion between Freud and Young about dreams and discussion of how the conscious and unconscious function. Although Freud argues that the unconscious is simply “a reservoir of repressed thoughts and motivations,” I agree with Young’s idea that the unconscious is actually...
Post a Comment
Read more

Event 2

In tonight’s LASER event, I listened to five artists/scientists talk about the integration between art and technology in their lives, research, and in history. The presentations I found to be most interesting were by Robert Raffeatá, Maru García, and Ariel Levi Simmons. Raffeatá's culture community In Raffeatá’s work, she studies how culture interacts with how people think about their health. She discussed how our body is more microbe than human, in fact 90% of our body’s composition comes from microbes. I thought her presentation was interesting because she combined medicinal science to art and more abstract concepts of how humanity interprets and interacts with nature which creates the environment, a variable that she claims must be included i n the study of microbiology. Her ideas of how our health is a community was something I never heard before and to me further proved the point that medicine and art are very closely related like we learned in week 4. She also...
Post a Comment
Read more

Event 1

Tonight I went to an event called "Space Odyssey: Stanley Kubrick" at the LACMA. This event was a presentation about the 2001 science-fiction movie Space Odyssey and the origins of the idea, creation, and audience's reaction to the film when it premiered. Michael Benson, an author and artist who recently published a book about the creation of this film, discussed specific shots in the movie, such as a repetitive scene where the Jupiter-bound astronauts run on an artificial gravity centrifuge and how the perspective of the shot smoothly transitions from halfway up the wall to on the floor, which was a phenomenal and, according to the audience, boring segment of the film. This segment of the discussion reminded me of lecture 2 in week 2's topic of math in art. Because the perspective of the shot changed, it caused me to recall the golden ratio rule and made me wonder what t This event was pretty much exactly what this course's topic is about: technology and art. I...
Post a Comment
Read more