Skip to main content

Week 1: Two Cultures


Differences in left and right brain
https://ibrainandbody.com/left-brain-vs-right-brain/

There is no doubt that in the intellectual world around us, there are two types of people: logic and number oriented people, as well as creative and literary people. Even our brains separate the two types of thinking. C.P. Snow categorized these two types of people into the two cultures: literary intellectuals and natural science intellectuals. He also suggests the reason for the clear division of the arts/humanities and the sciences can be traced back to the universities. This division can be seen on UCLA campus, with the separation of the North and South. C.P. Snow then states that separation of the two fields cause capable minds to ignore science. I would have to agree with this. Growing up and being educated in some of the top private schools in the country, I have always been taught subjects through a keyhole. I learn scientific facts such as the laws of kinetic motion or number of electrons are in an atom shell, then I walk to another building to learn how to use iambic pentameter. Not one single class has shown me how these subjects are interrelated.
UCLA
North Campus is in yellow, South Campus in orange

This spring quarter, I started an environment class. In this class we will learn about the different aspects of food: molecular, political, social, and environmental factors, but mostly focus on the “spaces between them”, as my professor put it. In the current academic world, students are starting to realize the connections between the arts and sciences understanding the patterns and interrelationships between the two.

The Triple Bottom Line rule
shows the relationship between
social, environmental, and economic aspects. https://sustain.wisconsin.edu/sustainability/triple-bottom-line/  
Although C.P. Snow never addressed the third culture and people such as Brockton say the two cultures should be separated, I think many others have started to see the new possibilities there are with studying relationships instead of individual concepts. After reading Vesna and Kelly, I realize the two cultures will continue to cross over more and more, and so will my education. When Wilson stated, “science literacy will need to become much more widespread…[and] arts will need to be much more integrated,” I understood and agreed with this call to action. I think it is important for not only me, but for everyone to understand and acknowledge the importance of having a multifaceted perspective in every major, science or arts. 


x


 Sources:

Snow, C. P. “Two Cultures and the Scientific Revolution.” Reading. 1959. New York: Cambridge UP, 1961. Print.

Snow, C.P. The Two Cultures: And a Second Look. N.p.: n.p., 1963. Print.

Brockman, John. The Third Culture. N.p.: n.p., 1995. Print.

Vesna, Victoria. "Toward a Third Culture: Being In Between." Leonardo. 34 (2001): 121-125. Print.

Kelly, Kevin. "The Third Culture" Science 13 February 1998: Vol. 279 no. 5353 pp. 992-993. Web.

x

Comments

  1. UnknownApril 9, 2018 at 4:20 PM

    I agree with what you said, and I believe that it is important for the University to start approaching majors with an intersectional approach. With the majors being split into North and South campus we are teaching through a "key hole" again as you said your schools did growing up.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Week 7: Neuroscience + Art

This week’s topic was by far the most interesting topic so far because the brain is a field of science that is very unexplored even though our brains and our consciousness makes up who we are. One idea I thought was interesting was the art project FMRI by Suzanne Anker and Giovanni. They superimposed butterfly wings onto 15 different MRI brain scans, and even though the butterfly wings were identical on all scans, the differences in the brain images made each picture look different. I thought this was interesting because just like how no two people are alike, every brain is completely different too even when the same thing is done to each one of them. Another thing I found to be interesting was the discussion between Freud and Young about dreams and discussion of how the conscious and unconscious function. Although Freud argues that the unconscious is simply “a reservoir of repressed thoughts and motivations,” I agree with Young’s idea that the unconscious is actually...
Post a Comment
Read more

Event 2

In tonight’s LASER event, I listened to five artists/scientists talk about the integration between art and technology in their lives, research, and in history. The presentations I found to be most interesting were by Robert Raffeatá, Maru García, and Ariel Levi Simmons. Raffeatá's culture community In Raffeatá’s work, she studies how culture interacts with how people think about their health. She discussed how our body is more microbe than human, in fact 90% of our body’s composition comes from microbes. I thought her presentation was interesting because she combined medicinal science to art and more abstract concepts of how humanity interprets and interacts with nature which creates the environment, a variable that she claims must be included i n the study of microbiology. Her ideas of how our health is a community was something I never heard before and to me further proved the point that medicine and art are very closely related like we learned in week 4. She also...
Post a Comment
Read more

Event 1

Tonight I went to an event called "Space Odyssey: Stanley Kubrick" at the LACMA. This event was a presentation about the 2001 science-fiction movie Space Odyssey and the origins of the idea, creation, and audience's reaction to the film when it premiered. Michael Benson, an author and artist who recently published a book about the creation of this film, discussed specific shots in the movie, such as a repetitive scene where the Jupiter-bound astronauts run on an artificial gravity centrifuge and how the perspective of the shot smoothly transitions from halfway up the wall to on the floor, which was a phenomenal and, according to the audience, boring segment of the film. This segment of the discussion reminded me of lecture 2 in week 2's topic of math in art. Because the perspective of the shot changed, it caused me to recall the golden ratio rule and made me wonder what t This event was pretty much exactly what this course's topic is about: technology and art. I...
Post a Comment
Read more